Ardea
Official journal of the Netherlands Ornithologists' Union

login


[close window] [previous abstract] [next abstract]

Zwarts L., Hulscher J.B., Koopman K., & Zegers P.M. (1996) Short-term variation in the body weight of Oystercatchers Haematopus ostralegus: effect of exposure time by day and night, temperature and wind force . ARDEA 84 (A): 357-372
The available feeding time of coastal Oystercatchers varies from day to day due to the effect of wind direction and wind force on the water level. If the birds are not able to feed at all during a day, they lose 30 g, or 6% of their body weight. The body weight increases with the duration of the available feeding time, irrespective whether it is day or night. Oystercatchers continue to feed at night, at least in autumn and winter. Although wind force and wind direction affect the daily duration of the available feeding time, this variation fades away if calculated over a number of days, and therefore does not affect the birds in the long-term. Does the body weight increase, or decrease, with the higher costs of living associated with low temperatures and strong winds? A decrease in body weight with increased cost of living would suggest that the birds are not able to find the extra food required to compensate for the higher maintenance level ('undercompensation'). An increase in body weight, on the other hand, would suggest that the birds in these difficult circumstances eat even more than needed in order to increase their body reserves in cases still worse conditions arrive ('overcompensation'). Unfortunately, the field data are confusing. The weak increase in body weight at low temperatures suggests an overcompensation, but the observed clear decrease in body weight with strong winds suggests an undercompensation. However, the increase of body weight with lower temperature is not large and is possibly due to intervening variables, so it is not clear whether this was an actual overcompensation. The negative effect of wind force on body weight is presumably caused by undercompensation in combination with a decrease in the feeding success.


[close window] [previous abstract] [next abstract]